Wirkungsnachweis aus der Literatur

Kurzfristig (< 1 Jahr)
Mikro (Individuum)
Psychisch & Physiologisch
NEU

boosting self-esteem and confidence

psychosoziales Befinden

Participants also acquired practical skills such as survival, farming, and horticultural skills […]. These activities, especially those related to farming and food production, gave participants a sense of accomplishment, which contributed positively to their well-being. The support and encouragement from workshop coaches were pivotal in boosting participants’ confidence. The secure and positive environment provided allowed them to regain self-esteem, especially for those who had experienced negative work environments in the past. Interviewee 5, who had experienced bullying in a previous job, explained: "That I’ve learned to be more confident about my own skills. And that because they encourage you here, when you have a good idea, and they compliment you, so you get those feelings of success and that helps you go further…"

Beschreibung der Aktivität

Three nature-based youth workshops
Two workshops were organized by the municipality (Workshop 1 and Workshop 2), and one by the nonprofit organization (Workshop 3). Workshop 1 focused on nature and sports activities, Workshop 2 focused on nature and environmental management activities, and Workshop 3 also focused on environmental management tasks, urban gardening, and other activities to promote well-being and responsible environmental action. Participants were engaged in the workshops for one to four days per week for four to six hours at a time. The participants of the study were young adults outside education or employment, and particpated in a nature-based workshop as a part of their activation and rehabilitation program.
Finnland
Most participants (75%) attended the workshop for 2-6 months, while a few participated for 1-2 years.
20-26 years; average age was 23.4 years
teilnehmende Kinder und Jugendliche

Evaluierung der Aktivität

Sixteen participants completed survey questionnaires assessing the cognitive and social outcomes of the interventions and the key elements contributing to their effectiveness. We used a six-item instrument for cognitive outcomes and a seven-item instrument for social outcomes. The cognitive and social outcomes were assessed on a Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Nine participants took part in qualitative interviews.
In total, 18 participants provided data; 16 completed outcome questionnaires, and 9 participated in interviews post-intervention.